Driven
nuclear reactions -
- Do not rely on spontaneous fission,
- Produce no radioactive waste, and
- Do not have the potential to create a nuclear weapons capability.
The
principles of operation of reactors based on driven nuclear reactions are straightforward.
Overview of Driven Nuclear Reactors
A. Source of Energy and Fuel-Cost Considerations
About
1% of the mass of neutrons is typically converted into energy when
they are absorbed into atomic nuclei. For each 100 grams of
neutrons absorbed, about 1 gram will be converted into energy:
90 million
megajoules (1 x 10-3 kg x (3 x 108)2 joules),
which
is similar to the amount of energy produced by burning about 2,700
tonnes of coal. If coal costs around $120/tonne, the fuel-cost for
this amount of energy would be nearly $324,000.
B. Reaction
Steps
- Mechanism to induce ejection of neutrons.
- Ejection of neutrons from suitable sources.
- Absorption of neutrons into suitable target, with extraction of thermal-energy to drive conventional steam-turbine power station.
In neutron absorption, the nucleus absorbs the neutron and becomes excited, typically emitting capture gamma rays. |
C. Feasibility
Assessment and Possible Unintended Benefits
For
assessment of reaction steps “2” and “3”, it may be expedient
to substitute a radioactive isotope produced in a research reactor
for the eventual mechanism that is to be used to induce ejection of
neutrons.
For
example, Antimony 124 (half-life 60 days) produces
high-energy photons that are only slightly above the energy-level
needed to eject neutrons from Beryllium. (Note: Of all the naturally
occurring, non-radioactive elements, Beryllium is quite unusual in
possessing a neutron which requires relatively little energy to
remove it from its nucleus.) The by-product is Helium – each
Beryllium atom splitting into 2 Helium atoms after losing a
neutron. About 1 kilogram of Beryllium would yield about
100 grams of neutrons, which, on being absorbed by a suitable
target, would release about the same amount of energy produced by
burning 2,700 tonnes of coal.
For
absorption of neutrons, naturally occurring Cadmium contains about
12% Cadmium 113 and 28% Cadmium 114. Cadmium 113
readily absorbs neutrons and is converted to Cadmium 114.
The
long-term storage of radioactive waste from conventional nuclear
reactors is not an issue for driven nuclear reactors. It is worth
observing that the timescales involved in storage of radioactive
waste are related to the time in which radioactive decay takes place
under natural conditions.
Radioactive
isotopes either possess an excess of neutrons – which tends to make
them potentially useful sources from which to induce ejection of
neutrons; or they possess an excess of protons – which tends to
make them potentially useful as neutron-absorbing targets.
One
implication of this is that it may be convenient for the foreseeable
future to fuel driven nuclear reactors with radioactive waste from
conventional nuclear reactors.
A
further possibility is the operation of driven nuclear reactors
primarily to produce valuable materials, with energy output as a
by-product.
Related article: Nuclear Power and Nuclear Energy versus Nuclear Technology
Related article: Nuclear Power and Nuclear Energy versus Nuclear Technology
0 comments:
Post a Comment