For instance
- South Australia's 150 MW concentrated solar thermal power plant - with its need for capital expenditure to provide thermal storage, and
- Yorke Biomass Energy - straw fuel could be used in place of thermal storage, reducing the capital expenditure of the concentrated solar thermal power station.
The synthesis gas produced:
- Avoids the cost of the thermal energy storage needed by the concentrated solar thermal power station. This is because the solar thermal energy is stored in the form of synthesis gas.
- Allows the energy in both the straw and the concentrated solar thermal energy to be used for a gas-fueled internal combustion engine or combined cycle gas turbine electricty generation. This raises the conversion efficiency to 60 percent - far above the efficiency that either power plant can achieve now (assuming they both plan to use steam turbine generators at efficiencies between 20 percent and 40 percent.)
Alternate Approaches to Solar Thermal Power Generation | Professor Evelyn Wang | https://t.co/vGlfilxcX3 | https://t.co/EEnPhFcNIP via @MIT @YouTube #WomenInSTEM #science #Engineering— Askgerbil Now (@Askgerbil) February 15, 2018
1 comments:
Yep.
There should be more exploration of these type of synchronicities.
There will be opportunities to add these system later.
Sure it is good engineering and that is most always a good thing.
(and yes there is an opportunity cost)
Establishing an entire economic ecosystem for multiple specialised sectors is one thing.
Once you have the energy available , reliable and cheap. Then you can add value and many other buzz words:)
(and muck about with all those none engineering things like supply chains and markets and politicians and ... )
Post a Comment