and waste investors' money like Alcoa in Australia
Or
Invest in 21st Century Technology
and remain a viable business"...overall fuel saving by the proposed Aluminium and methanol coproduction, relative to the conventional processes, would be 53.3%." Read more below...
Extract from:
M. Halmann, A. Frei, and A. Steinfeld
Mineral Processing & Extractive Metall. Rev., 32: 247–266, 2011
Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN: 0882-7508 print/1547-7401 online
DOI: 10.1080/08827508.2010.530723
INTRODUCTION
The carbothermic
reduction of alumina can be represented by overall (simplified) net
reaction as follows:
Al2O3(s)
+ 3C(s) = 2Al(g) + 3CO(g) (1)
The current industrial
production of aluminium is based on the electrolytic
Figure 3: Equilibrium distribution vs. temperature for the system Al2O3
+ 3C at 10-4 bar.
|
Under a vacuum of 10-4
bar (Figure 3), with an onset of Aluminium production already at 1600 K, the
formation of Al2O and Al4C3 is
calculated to be significantly suppressed.
At 1800 K, the
equilibrium reaction is represented by Equation (10):
Al2O3
+ 3C = 1.99Al(g) + 2.99CO(g) + 0.006Al2O3(g)
+ 0.006C(gr) (10)
A preliminary estimation of the energy demand of the process under these conditions
was made in a two-step calculation. The hypothetical heat input in
the reaction of Equation (1) to 2Al(g) + 3CO(g)
at T=1800K and 1 bar was calculated to be 1605 kJ / mol Al2O3.
The minimum work of expansion from 1 bar to p=10-4 bar was
699 kJ / mol Al2O3. The total theoretical
energy input would be 0.0427 GJ / kg Aluminium, comparable to that of
about 0.045 GJ / kg Aluminium in modern smelters by the Hall–Héroult
process (International Aluminium Institute 2009). In case CO would be
submitted to water-gas shift to form syngas for methanol synthesis,
this could result in the production of 1.056 kg methanol / kg Aluminium. In
conventional methanol production via methane steam reforming (MSR),
the total fuel consumption is 0.0445 GJ / kg methanol, thus requiring
0.047 GJ to produce the above amount of methanol (Frank et al. 2009).
Therefore, the theoretical overall fuel saving by the proposed Aluminium and methanol coproduction, relative to the conventional processes, would be 53.3%. The required heat for the process may be supplied by concentrated solar energy, induction furnaces, or electric discharges.
Therefore, the theoretical overall fuel saving by the proposed Aluminium and methanol coproduction, relative to the conventional processes, would be 53.3%. The required heat for the process may be supplied by concentrated solar energy, induction furnaces, or electric discharges.
In case concentrated
solar energy would be used for process heat, the total theoretical
energy demand for pumping work would be only 0.0129 GJ / kg Aluminium.
If the combustion of fossil fuel is used for process heat, the calculated CO2 emission would be 3.32 kg CO2 / kg Aluminium, resulting in 53% avoidance of greenhouse gas emission relative to modern Hall–Héroult plants (International Aluminium Institute 2009). Emissions would be further decreased when applying concentrated solar energy as the source of process heat.
If the combustion of fossil fuel is used for process heat, the calculated CO2 emission would be 3.32 kg CO2 / kg Aluminium, resulting in 53% avoidance of greenhouse gas emission relative to modern Hall–Héroult plants (International Aluminium Institute 2009). Emissions would be further decreased when applying concentrated solar energy as the source of process heat.
0 comments:
Post a Comment