Latest Buzz...
                  

Translate

Showing posts with label budget. Show all posts
Showing posts with label budget. Show all posts

Thursday, April 7, 2016

Government 'own-goal' on uni fees

Labor has accused the federal government of an own-goal after the Parliamentary Budget Office predicted student loan debt will blow out to $11 billion. (Read more: "Government 'own-goal' on uni fees: Labor")

A Parliamentary Budget Office analysis predicts the cost of student debt will climb to $11 billion within a decade, as total exposure reaches $185 billion.

Simon Birmingham struggles to blame others for this own-goal.
Simon Birmingham struggles to blame others for this own-goal.


The Coalition Government was warned two years ago, in May 2014, that its University funding policy would blow a hole in the budget. Joe Hockey and Christopher Pyne didn't do arithmetic in 2014:







But the Coalition Government still doesn't do arithmetic...

Monday, November 10, 2014

PM Transcript: Address to the APEC CEO Summit National


Google "Dr Vu Tien Loc the Chairman of the APEC CEO Summit" then select the first item found by the search...

Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet - Hit by public service staff cut
Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet - Hit by public service staff cuts
 Result -

Fatal error. Cannot open database connection. could not find driver 


This is Google's cache of http://pmtranscripts.dpmc.gov.au/preview.php?did=22590. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on 5 Oct 2014 15:00:57 GMT.


Thank you very, very much Mr Price for those words of introduction. I would also like to acknowledge Dr Vu Tien Loc the Chairman of the APEC CEO Summit, ladies and gentlemen.

First may I say that it's a great pleasure for me and for all the other Australians here, either as delegates to the CEO Summit or as part of my travelling party to be in Hanoi. I want to congratulate the Vietnamese Government, I want to congratulate the business community of Vietnam for the preparations that have been made for this the largest gathering of this kind by far ever staged in Vietnam. It does have historic significance for this country and it is an important further milestone along the path of bringing the people of this country and the people of the region, not least my own country, where there are almost 200,000 Australians of Vietnamese descent bringing our two societies together. I hope that all of the members of the various delegations will go away from Hanoi with warm and very affectionate views of both this lovely city and also the friendship of the Vietnamese people.

We gather at this APEC Summit, of course, all of us, I think, very conscious of two historic and permanent shifts in the world's economic order that are under way. The first of those is that the centre of gravity of the world's middle class is shifting permanently to Asia. Not since the industrial revolution has the centre of gravity of the world's middle class inexorably shifted in such a direction. By the year 2010 or 2015 at the latest there will be between 400-800 million middle class citizens in the nations of Asia and for the first time since the industrial revolution it will be possible to say to that the centre of gravity of the world's middle class has shifted from Europe and North America to Asia.

The second inexorable and permanent, in my view, economic shift that is occurring is that the most dynamic region in the world is, and will remain, the Asia Pacific region. The region that is so far as economic leaders are concerned represented by the APEC gathering. And that is the reason why Australia has from the very beginning put an enormous investment of time and effort politically and diplomatically and economically in APEC and why I take this opportunity of reaffirming my country's very strong commitment to APEC as the principal vehicle for regional cooperation at an economic level.

These meetings provide not only a remarkable opportunity to share experiences and test policies economically but also a remarkable opportunity for bilateral political exchange and dealing with some of the world and the region's particular political challenges.

I put it to you that, and I would hope this is an incontestable proposition, but I always think it's a good idea to repeat incontestable propositions unless they lose that particular character. I put it to you that the great success of this region has been its investment in openness and innovation. That it's a good idea to do a little stocktake at a meeting like this and to trace the experience of those countries that have embraced innovation and have embraced openness and globalisation and compare that experience with those countries that have set their face against it. And also trace the experience of countries that went down the path of globalisation and innovation earlier compared with those countries that took rather longer to realise that innovation and globalisation and economic openness remain the unavoidable glide paths to economic growth and the lifting of living standards.

It's popular of course to be in receipt of admonitions from leaders of pop culture, if I can put it that way, and others to do more to lift the world's poor out of their current state. Some of those commentators are not so ready to acknowledge the extraordinarily large number, the millions of people in this region and in other parts of the Asian region that have been lifted from poverty over the last 25 years as a result of the application of the principles of innovation and globalisation.

The success story of countries such as China in particular, but increasingly of course India and other member countries of the Asia-Pacific region. The success story of those countries in lifting their populations out of poverty through economic growth is often lost sight of. Understandably the world still, and rightly so, agonises about the apparent inability of the countries of Africa to seize the tools of better governance and economic optimism to bring about the same changes within their nations but it cannot be denied that the success of so many nations in this region in lifting their populations out of poverty has been truly remarkable and is more deserving of comment and praise than is often the case.

I think it is therefore important that a meeting like this to reaffirm our belief that we should stick to the winning formula, we should therefore do two things in the area of international trade. As a group the APEC countries should reassert their belief and confidence in the importance of the current Doha Round being conducted under the auspices of the World Trade Organisation. It doesn't look very optimistic at the present time because there remains a gulf despite what I regard as relatively generous offer from the United States, there still remains a significant gap between the position of the United States, the European Union and some other major participants in the international trade negotiations but we should take the opportunity at this APEC gathering to reassert the importance of the Doha Round and reassert our belief that achieving progress on the multilateral front is a goal that all of us should maintain and should strive to achieve.

The other thing I believe we should do is to recommit ourselves to the Bogor goals of free trade within the developed countries by 2010 and within the developing countries by 2020.Now we haven't got there. You would have to be a supreme optimist to say that we would absolutely achieve the first of those objectives by 2010 but we have made a lot of progress and I think it is always important in these things to preserve a sense of balance and a sense of perspective and we ought to note the progress that has been made, the sharply lower trade barriers that exist between the member countries of APEC and recommit ourselves to achieving an even closer outcome in relation to those goals.

In introducing me Mr Price was kind enough to talk about Australia's own economic experience. My country is now in its sixteenth year of unbroken economic growth and it's probably the longest period of continuous economic expansion that Australia has had in her history. We did have quite strong levels of economic growth in the 1960s but in those days we were a far more protected economy. We had a controlled exchange rate, we had high tariffs, we had a centralised wage fixing system that said that you should be paid the same irrespective of output which was a nice idea in theory but in practice it did have a stultifying effect on Australia's capacity to grow and to compete.

In 2006 we are a vastly different country [emphasis added]. We have very few tariffs to speak of. We of course have a floating exchange rate, we have a much freer labour market, we have a very strong budget surplus and we have engaged a number of very important innovations in economic policy. And one of those which is not very often remarked about, either in Australia or elsewhere, is that I think we are the first and perhaps only developed country in the world to have totally privatised our labour exchange system. Something that we did not long after the Government came to office in 1996 [emphasis added].

So we have had a great deal of success and I would say undeniably that this is the product of policies of openness and policies of innovation and Australia's continued economic growth will rest very heavily on a maintenance of those policies.

We have, of course, been blessed by providence with remarkable energy resources and I want to say before I conclude something about a contemporary issue and a contemporary challenge for all of our countries and that is in the interlocking areas of climate change and energy security. And these two issues do have to be talked about together because they are really the flipsides of the same coin. No country that is seeking to expand and lift its living standards is going to forsake the availability of cheap resources and cheap supplies of energy. And equally no country is going to imperil its energy security as part of the process of reducing the negative effects of climate change [emphasis added].

Like many people I am not necessarily convinced that everything that is said about climate change is right. I retain some degree of scepticism about some of the things that are said in a frenetic manner about climate change. I am nonetheless of the view that the accumulation of sensible scientific opinion suggests that the level of greenhouse gas emissions is potentially dangerous and even if at a minimum we adopt the insurance principle it's important that the world do something about it.

One of the great advantages of APEC is that it brings together five of the six member countries of AP6 which is some five countries, the United States, Australia, Korea, China and Japan, with India being the only other member of AP6 which is not a member of APEC. And this particular grouping of countries which coincidentally comprises about 50 per cent of the world's GDP, about 50 per cent of the world's greenhouse gas emissions and about 50 per cent of the world's population also coincidentally brings together some energy-hungry countries such as China and India and also some energy-rich countries such as Australia and Canada.

In order to move our own country's policies forward on issues of climate change and energy security, I have recently announced a task group comprising both the Government and the Australian business community to examine in broad detail the size and structure, or the nature rather and structure of what a world emissions trading system might look like.

Australia has not signed the or ratified the Kyoto Protocol and we won't be ratifying the Kyoto Protocol [emphasis added] for the reasons we have stated for a number of years. Not only is that Protocol not comprehensive enough in its application to the world's major emitters but potentially carried with it penalties and disadvantages for Australia, particularly in relation to our unique endowment of energy. We as a matter of principle would support involvement on a global basis in a emissions trading system and one of the purposes of this task group in Australia is to examine the structure and the nature of what a global emissions trading system might take and also in the meantime the additional steps our own country will take consistent with the development of a global emissions trading system.

I might mention that although Australia has not and will not ratify the Kyoto Protocol the emissions target set by Kyoto for Australia will either be met or as we say 'near as damn it' be met and that target of 108 between the designated years of 2008 and 2012 and whilst we for good national interest reasons have not embraced ratification, we have nonetheless committed ourselves to achieve the target which has been set and I am very optimistic that we will in fact do that.

Part of our process in relation to climate change is to have an open-minded approach to nuclear power. I believe that public opinion in Australia has shifted very markedly on nuclear power and I see the response of our country and indeed the response of the world in relation to the challenge of climate change as involving not one single response but a response that acknowledges the importance of such developments and innovations as clean coal technology and Australia has invested very heavily in that and will invest even more in that and I hope in partnership with other countries in the region. But also in acknowledging that renewables, although they can never take the place of fossil fuels and potentially nuclear power in relation to base load power generation, that they can play a part. So we see all aspects of generation. Fossil fuels, which we see the world still being very heavily dependent on decades into the future, nuclear power and renewables all playing a very significant role.

So ladies and gentlemen let me finish by saying again that we are part of both geographically and economically part of a permanent and historic shift in two areas. The way in which the centre of gravity of the world's middle class has shifted to Asia, the extraordinary contribution being made to that process by China and now increasingly India and of course our own region which brings together what is still the most powerful economy in the world and in my view likely to remain for the foreseeable future, the United States, and the other great economies of this region.

This is the most dynamic, fastest growing, vital economic region of the world and I hope that the opportunity of this meeting taking place here in Hanoi is of lasting value to the people of this country that I wish well on behalf of my Government and all of the Australian people.

Thank you.

Friday, July 25, 2014

Government fumbles energy policy

In December 2013 the Abbott Government released an Energy Policy issues paper.

"The Energy White Paper will set out a coherent and integrated approach to energy policy to reduce cost pressures on households and businesses, improve Australia's international competitiveness and grow our export base and economic prosperity."



The Terms of Reference began -
The Australian Government has committed to a set of signature economy-wide reforms to grow the economy while addressing rising business and household costs.
The Australian Government is committed to working closely with industry and state and territory governments in the development of an integrated, coherent national energy policy.
The issues to be considered in the Energy White Paper were -

  • policy and regulatory reform to secure reliable, competitively and transparently priced energy for a growing population and productive economy, including the efficiency and effectiveness of regulatory bodies;
  • the appropriate role for government in the energy sector;
  • opportunities to drive the more productive and efficient use of energy;
  • energy related distribution infrastructure to deliver efficient national markets;
  • alternative transport fuel sources;
  • workforce issues, including national skills development needs;
  • emerging energy technologies and new energy sources; and
  • future growth in exports of energy products, including our world leading services industries.

A Green Paper will be released for consultation in May 2014.
The Energy White Paper will be completed in September 2014.
The timetable set out was -
The Energy White Paper will be led by the Department of Industry. 
An Issues Paper will be released by mid December 2013 to initiate consultation. 
A Green Paper will be released for consultation in May 2014. 
The Energy White Paper will be completed in September 2014. 







High gas prices threaten thousands of jobs, billions of dollars: industry

ABC News | 21 July 2014

With energy prices soaring and threatening jobs, manufacturing, mining and agriculture, the Government has delayed the release of the energy policy Green Paper. It was not completed in May. The White Paper - due to be completed in September 2014 - has also been delayed.



According to the Industry Department web site in July 2014 -

The Energy Policy Green paper is now expected to be released in August.
Further submissions will be sought on the release of this paper.
It will be December before the Energy White Paper is released.




Submissions by special interest groups include -

The Minerals Council of Australia - February 2014

Low cost, reliable energy has been a critical element of the international competitiveness of Australian industry and the living standards of households for several decades. The central role of low cost reliable coal in electricity generation has been the primary contributor to this competitive edge.

But this advantage has been lost, with electricity prices now amongst the highest in the developed world, substantially due to ill-judged policy interventions. High energy costs represent a substantial burden on Australian households and industry, including the mining sector which accounted for 13.5 per cent of final energy consumption in 2011-12.

These policy mistakes should be reversed including by:
  • Urgent repeal of the carbon tax, which should lead to an immediate 9 per cent decrease in energy costs.
  • The phasing out of the Renewable Energy Target, which represents a $20 to $30 billion subsidy to the renewable sector by 2030, with the cost borne by industrial users and households.
The Government should also recognise that costly efforts to change the energy mix ignore the substantial gains in low emissions technologies from traditional energy sources. Australia does not have to choose between coal and a low emissions future.

The roadmap to a low emissions coal future is increasingly clear. ...
The chart below is from the Minerals Council of Australia submission on the government's energy policy issues paper. It conceals two significant facts: 1. Existing natural gas power stations achieve 60 per cent thermal efficiency and produce just 330 g of CO2 per kWh. 2. The coal industry has built and tested two coal-to-gas power stations in the US that are able now to capture CO2. These power stations can use natural gas or coal as fuel. They reduce the amount of coal needed to produce electricity. It seems the coal industry wishes to ensure that technology to reduce demand for coal is not used.
Comment: The "roadmap" to a low emissions coal future is increasingly clear.
It is costly and relies on technology that is obsolete.
See: "The Coal Lobby Scores an Own Goal"




The Institute of Public Affairs - March 2014

A prominent role in the paper’s terms of reference is given to the supposed need to maintain analytical capability within the government. This Departmental protection goal is an unwarranted priority in the context of the market driven industry the White Paper claims to be championing. ...

...

Comment:
"The market can solve problems I don't understand" - the last refuge of ignorance.

Australians would still be using leaded petrol if their governments had the IPA's faith that "the market" can solve any problem and governments don't need and shouldn't maintain informed policy advice.
It would be unfortunate if the White Paper were to be progressed as though, in the absence of government oversight, energy markets would not develop efficiently. Markets develop from the interactions of consumers with businesses, which seek to sell their goods, access inputs and reduce risks. Governments’ role is to allow these processes to be pursued and to uphold the law.

Rather than a plethora of goals, the White Paper should have a single focus: to allow the market to bring about efficient production of energy with interventions limited to addressing natural monopoly situations. Anything beyond that will ensure the weaknesses presently evident will remain.

...

Australia is likely to have the lowest cost sources of fossil fuel powered electricity generation in the world. These are, most significantly based on almost endless supplies of coal, much of which is conveniently located close to the main load centres. The coal used for local electricity generation has no real alternative uses as it is of too low a quality for profitable export (and in the case of brown coal is not even easily transportable). Australia’s low costs, on current technology, can generate unlimited amounts of base load power at around $35 per MWh.

This is almost certainly the lowest cost power available in large quantity in the world. Other countries have abundant coal reserves but few have them as readily accessible. Alternative energy sources are more expensive. Solar is impossibly so, ...

Friday, May 16, 2014

Great Big Lies - Scrapping the Carbon Tax and Reducing the Cost of Living

Key Points

The Coalition will abolish the carbon tax.
Average Families will be Better Off by $3,000 under the Coalition.
A LIE!
Great Big Liberal Lies
Liberal Lies

The carbon tax indisputably adds to the cost of living, it makes households and families pay more for electricity and gas, it costs businesses more to operate, and it makes everything in our economy more expensive.

Your cost of living is unnecessarily higher because of the carbon tax.

Average families will be more than $550 better off next year alone under the Coalition’s plan than under Labor’s carbon tax. Over the next six years they will be $3,000 better off under the Coalition than under Kevin Rudd’s carbon tax.

And on the Government’s own figures, the carbon tax will increase six-fold between mid-2014 and mid-2019 – reaching $38 a tonne by 2019 and increasing to $350 a tonne over time.

Only the Coalition will scrap the carbon tax lock, stock and barrel.

This means that under the Coalition, average families will be better off by more than $550 a year in 2014-15, rising to around $900 a year in 2019-20.

On 5 August 2013, the Leader of the Opposition, the Hon Tony Abbott MHR, wrote to the Secretary of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet to advise him that, should the Coalition form government on 7 September 2013, our first legislative priority will be to scrap the carbon tax.

Only the Coalition will reduce your cost of living by abolishing the carbon tax.

The Coalition could not be clearer: the carbon tax will be gone under a Coalition government and it will be our very first order of business.

Introduction

Financial pressure on Australian families will be dramatically eased.
A LIE!
The Coalition recognises that Australian families are struggling with cost of living pressures. They are seeing their electricity bills increase significantly, even when they have done the right thing and reduced their usage.

Your cost of living is unnecessarily higher because of the carbon tax.

The Government’s own figures show that the carbon tax makes electricity at least 10 per cent more expensive and gas bills at least 9 per cent more expensive, rising each year as the carbon tax increases.

The carbon tax is unequivocally a tax that punishes households for using electricity and it is a tax that increases the cost of everyday items, especially essential items.

The Coalition will act immediately to rescind Labor’s carbon tax.

This toxic, job-destroying tax punishes successful and hard-working Australian businesses, particularly trade exposed businesses.

The carbon tax only causes jobs and emissions to be exported overseas.

The carbon tax has meant:

  • a $9 billion a year new tax;
  • a 10 per cent hike in electricity bills in the first year alone;
  • a 9 per cent per cent hike in gas bills in the first year alone; and
  • higher marginal tax rates for low and middle income earners.
Australians are now going to yet another election with the Labor leader promising “there will be no carbon tax under the government I lead.”

But on Labor’s own figures the carbon tax is set to go to $38 in a few short years and to $350 over the coming decades. Importantly, it will still be $24.15 for the next 12 months. Mr Rudd can change the name, but whether it is fixed or floating, it is still a carbon tax.

If Labor is re-elected, Australians will still be paying more – a total of over $3,000 for the average family over the six years to mid‑2020, on top of $545 this year (on the Government’s own figures). It will continue to be a tax on electricity bills which will hurt Australian families and hurt local businesses.

The Coalition will not let the carbon tax destroy Australian industry and Australian jobs. The carbon tax is an act of economic self-harm that unnecessarily adds to the cost of living.

The Plan

1. Abolish the carbon tax

Australians will have tax cuts funded by smaller government, not by taking money out of one pocket to put it in the other.
A LIE!
The Coalition will abolish the carbon tax.

We have a clear and definitive action agenda to get rid of the carbon tax as a priority.

The Coalition will honour our promise to the Australian people and make abolishing the carbon tax the first order of business, if elected at the next election.

On 5 August 2013, the Leader of the Opposition, the Hon Tony Abbott MHR, wrote to the Secretary of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet to make it clear that, if elected, the first priority of a Coalition government will be the repeal of the carbon tax.

The Leader of the Opposition also wrote to the Clean Energy Finance Corporation on 5 August 2013 to make it clear that the Corporation should desist from making any further determinations in relation to grants, funds or financing.

If elected, the Coalition will take immediate steps to implement our plan to abolish the carbon tax:

  • on day one, the Coalition will instruct the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet to draft legislation that repeals the carbon tax and to have the legislation ready within one month;
  • on day one, the Treasurer will notify the Clean Energy Finance Corporation that it should suspend its operations and instruct the Treasury to prepare legislation to permanently shut-down the Corporation;
  • within the first month, the Cabinet will approve legislation to repeal the carbon tax;
  • on the very first day of a new Parliament, the Coalition will introduce legislation to repeal the carbon tax; and
  • within the first sitting fortnight of Parliament, the new government will introduce legislation to shut-down the Clean Energy Finance Corporation.
As soon as the carbon tax is repealed, the Environment Minister will introduce legislation to enact the Coalition’s Direct Action Plan on climate change and carbon emissions.

We cannot make it clearer: the carbon tax is gone under a Coalition government and it will be our very first order of business from day one.

2. Average Families will be Better Off by $3,000 under the Coalition

With the carbon tax gone, families will be more than $550 better off next year alone under the Coalition's plan than under Labor's carbon tax. Over the next six years they will be $3,000 better off under the Coalition than under Kevin Rudd’s carbon tax.

The Coalition will provide income tax cuts without a carbon tax.

The Coalition will keep the current income tax thresholds and the current pension and benefit fortnightly rates while scrapping the carbon tax.

This means that Australian workers, families and pensioners will keep the tax cuts and fortnightly pension and benefit increases provided in Labor’s carbon tax package, but without the carbon tax.

As a result these tax cuts and fortnightly benefit increases will become genuine cost-of-living relief, worth around $4 billion a year, rather than partial compensation for Labor’s damaging carbon tax hit.

Australians will have tax cuts funded by smaller government, not by taking money out of one pocket to put it in the other. And people’s weekly and fortnightly budgets will be under less pressure as electricity prices fall and gas prices fall and the carbon tax no longer cascades through our economy.

This will also strengthen our economy, because there’ll be less tax hitting Australian businesses but not their overseas competitors – as even Labor now concedes.

Households will be able to plan their futures with confidence, the financial pressure on Australian families will be dramatically eased, and there will be more incentive for ordinary Australians to ‘have a go’ and get ahead.

Companies and small businesses will be much better off without a carbon tax.

We will remove the carbon tax and the cost burden it has placed on businesses which make it difficult to compete internationally when other companies are not paying the same tax.

The Choice

The Government’s own figures show that the carbon tax makes electricity at least 10 per cent more expensive and gas bills at least 9 per cent more expensive, rising each year as the carbon tax increases. The carbon tax is unequivocally an electricity tax that punishes households for using electricity.

There is abundant evidence of households and businesses paying more for electricity because of the carbon tax.

For the past three years the Government has simply been wrong to say households would not be worse off under the carbon tax, because the Government’s own figures showed that millions of households were not fully compensated under the carbon tax scheme.

And now even Labor, in a complete repudiation of everything they said for three years, have conceded that the carbon tax is hurting average families.

Kevin Rudd has announced that – in 11 months’ time, after the next election – he promises to make a change to the carbon tax which would affect the tax rate in just a single year.

In so doing he has declared that cutting the carbon tax rate would “help cost of living pressures for families” and “reduce costs for small business” – exactly what the Coalition has been saying all along.

But under Kevin Rudd’s minor tweaking, the carbon tax will still be a $58 billion tax through to 2020 instead of a $64 billion tax.

Kevin Rudd’s carbon tax will still cost average families $3,000 over the next six years, on top of $545 this year.

And on the Government’s own figures, the carbon tax will increase six-fold between mid-2014 and mid‑2019 – reaching $38 a tonne by 2019 and increasing to $350 a tonne over time.

Only the Coalition will scrap the carbon tax lock, stock and barrel.

Electricity is not a luxury – it is an essential part of daily life. If the Rudd-Gillard Government was even half sincere about taking the pressure off electricity, gas and other utility prices it would start by scrapping its carbon tax.


The Coalition will Abolish the Carbon Tax

COALITION – relative to Labor
LABOR – relative to the Coalition
An economy-wide carbon tax
No
Yes
Impact on families
More than $3,000 better off
More than $3,000 worse off
Tax cuts without a carbon tax
Yes
No
A carbon tax that rises to $350/tonne
No
Yes
Billions of taxpayer dollars spent on foreign carbon credits
No
Yes
A massive carbon bureaucracy
No
Yes
Australia’s carbon emissions
Down
Up
Your cost of living
Lower
Higher
Electricity prices
10 per cent lower
10 per cent higher
Gas prices
9 per cent lower
9 per cent higher
Cost to make an Australian-made car
Up to $400 cheaper
Up to $400 more expensive
Impact on aluminium production
61 per cent higher
61 per cent lower
Impact on coal production
17 per cent higher
17 per cent lower
Impact on steel and iron production
21 per cent higher
21 per cent lower
Local councils better off
Yes
No
Emergency services better off
Yes
No
Hospitals better off
Yes
No
Public transport better off
Yes
No
Schools better off
Yes
No
Small businesses better off
Yes
No
Taxpayers better off
Yes
No

Monday, December 16, 2013

The Great Barrier Reef vs the Queensland State Budget

Royalty revenue 

Dugong swimming in Queensland
Queensland - beautiful one day, a cesspit the next

Queensland Budget Strategy and Outlook 2013-14, page 54 

Royalty revenue grew strongly between 2000-01 and 2007-08, with growth in revenue in excess of 50% in both 2004-05 and 2005-06. In contrast to the other key discretionary revenues, royalty revenues reached a peak in 2008-09, as record coal prices had been contracted prior to the onset of the global financial crisis. Royalty revenue then fell significantly in 2009-10, along with coal contract prices, and has not yet returned to the levels of 2008-09.

Royalty revenue is estimated to have declined in 2012-13, primarily due to the current weakness in coal prices and high A$-US$ exchange rate. However,
  • royalties are expected to recover from 2013-14 onwards, 
  • supported by steady growth in export volumes
  • a recovery in coal prices and 
  • the exchange rate depreciating. 
The average growth rates projected across the forward estimates are still substantially lower than experienced during the 2000s, which was driven by sharp increases in price to a greater extent than volume growth.

Ignore greenies on reef dredging: Qld govt

December 12, 2013 (news.com.au)

Deputy Premier Jeff Seeney says activists will say anything to shut down the coal industry.

He says the public shouldn't be fooled by their "alarmist" response to the Abbot Point dredging project.

The federal government this week gave the green light for the massive project to expand the coal terminal in north Queensland.

The approval allows about three million cubic metres of dredge spoil to be dumped in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park.

Thursday, May 2, 2013

Economic benefits created by Australian Government budget deficits

Spain's house prices to fall another 30pc as glut keeps growing

The UK Telegraph, by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, 27 December 2012.
Spain's property slump will deepen for much of the next decade, and tracts of buildings along the Mediterranean coast will have to be demolished, the country's top consultants have warned.
Spanish government says the housing market has 'touched bottom' after falling 30pc since 2008
Spanish government says the housing market has 'touched bottom' after falling 30pc since 2008 |  Photo: AFP
...
Fresh losses could reach 50pc and drag on for 10 to 15 years in those places where construction ran wild during the bubble, bringing the total decline from peak to trough towards 75pc.

"The market is broken," said Fernando Rodríguez de Acuña, the group's vice-president. "We calculate that there are almost 2 million properties waiting to be sold. We have made no progress at all over the past five years in clearing the stock," he said.

March 2013 Euro area unemployment rate...

EUROPA Press Room, 30 April 2013.
Among the Member States, the highest unemployment rates were recorded in Greece (27.2% in January), Spain (26.7%) and Portugal (17.5%).
...
Compared with a year ago, the unemployment rate increased in nineteen Member States and fell in eight.
...
In March 2013, the highest youth unemployment rates (young persons under 25) were observed in Greece (59.1% (January 2013)), Spain (55.9%), Italy (38.4%) and Portugal (38.3%).

Spain: who is responsible for the property bubble?

BY EDWARD HARRISON / ON 22 FEBRUARY 2009.
This first part in a series of articles lays out the statistics of bubble and bust, demonstrating the scale of the bubble in Spain and it also makes a number of suggestion as to how to prevent a recurrence. You should note that this article points out Spain’s helplessness due to its lack of control over interest rates as a key impediment to solving the problem. ...